Home › YouTube Gaming vs Twitch

YouTube Gaming vs Twitch 2026: Hours Watched, Market Share and Creator Payouts

The last time YouTube published a count of its own gaming watch time, the figure was more than 100 billion hours — and it said 10 billion of those were live. Nine hours in ten were video-on-demand. Every chart in the Twitch-versus-YouTube argument measures the other tenth. That single ratio is why two outlets can name two different leaders in the same quarter and both be right, and it is the reason "who is winning the streaming war" is not a question with an answer. It is a question with a missing word: which business?

Are Twitch and YouTube Gaming even competing for the same thing?

No — and treating them as if they were is the error that produces every contradictory headline in this category. Twitch sells appointment viewing: a person shows up at a time, in a chat, and pays a monthly subscription to be part of a room. YouTube sells retrieval: a person searches for a boss fight, a patch explainer or a highlight, and an advertiser pays for the impression. Live is Twitch's product. Live is a feature on YouTube. Both sit inside a games industry worth about $205 billion with roughly 3.6 billion players, and neither platform's live audience is close to a majority of them.

You can see the difference in what each company reports. Amazon does not break Twitch out at all, so its revenue is an outside estimate. Alphabet disclosed YouTube's total revenue for the first time in February 2026 — more than $60 billion for 2025, of which $40.37 billion was advertising — and does not break out gaming, because gaming is a category inside a video library, not a division.

Who has more hours watched, Twitch or YouTube Gaming?

Twitch, on live hours — 19.2 billion against 8.8 billion in 2025, a lead of 2.2×. On all gaming video, YouTube, and it is not close. The cleanest proof is not a modern estimate at all; it is a single statement YouTube made in December 2020, when it reported more than 100 billion hours of gaming watch time and 10 billion hours of live gaming in the same breath. One source, one year, one definition — and a 10-to-1 ratio between everything and the live part.

Put that against what the trackers measured for Twitch in the same year and the scoreboard flips depending on which row you read.

YouTube figures are YouTube's own, published 8 December 2020 and reported by Input and the Washington Post: more than 100 billion hours of gaming watch time (double 2018, implying roughly 50 billion that year), 10 billion hours of live-streamed gaming, more than 40 million actively streaming gaming channels. Twitch 2020 is Streamlabs and Stream Hatchet data, reported as 18.41 billion hours in one compilation and 18.6 billion in another; we use the lower figure throughout. The two sides are measured by different parties with different incentives — this table demonstrates the size of the scope gap, not an audited head-to-head. Ratios are 16Best calculations.

Does that 10% ratio still hold? Nobody outside Google knows, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. If it did, YouTube's 8.8 billion live gaming hours in 2025 would sit under a total of roughly 88 billion; if live has grown to 15% of the mix the total lands near 59 billion; if it has fallen to 8%, near 110 billion (16Best analysis — an inference from a five-year-old ratio, not a measurement, and it is deliberately kept out of the summary figures at the top of this page). What the range does establish is that no plausible value of the live share puts YouTube's gaming consumption in the same order of magnitude as Twitch's 19.2 billion.

There is a second, quieter finding hiding in the same numbers. YouTube's live gaming hours in 2025 — 8.8 billion, its best year on Stream Hatchet's record — are below the 10 billion YouTube itself claimed for live gaming in 2020. Two measurers, two definitions of what counts as gaming, so this is not proof of decline. It is a warning that "record year for YouTube Gaming" describes a tracker's series, not necessarily the platform.

Is Twitch actually losing to YouTube Gaming?

It is losing share fast and losing hours slowly, and the two facts point in different directions. Twitch's slice of live-streaming hours fell from roughly 70% to 54% — 16 percentage points, which is a 22.9% relative decline, nearly a quarter of the dominance it held (16Best analysis, consistent with our Twitch streaming statistics page). Meanwhile the category grew.

Hours watched, hours streamed and unique channels: Streamlabs and Stream Hatchet Q1 2026 Live Streaming Report, with Q1 2025 comparatives from the same series. Live only. Audience per broadcast hour is a 16Best calculation — hours watched divided by hours streamed — and is equivalent to an average concurrent viewership per live channel. Unique-channel counts include channels that streamed once in the quarter, so they are a supply measure rather than an active-creator count.

Twitch's annual series is the one place a genuine continuous run of numbers exists, and it has been going one way since the lockdown peak.

YouTube Gaming's share of live hours went 17% in 2023 to 23% in 2024 to 24% in 2025 — seven points, but a 41.2% relative gain in two years (16Best analysis). Note the deceleration in the last step: one point, after six. On our own trend work, the platform positioned to pass Twitch on live hours is YouTube rather than Kick, arriving around 2029 — the derivation and its assumptions sit on the Twitch page.

Is a new creator easier to find on YouTube Gaming than on Twitch?

Yes, and the size of the effect is larger than most creator advice admits: a YouTube Gaming live channel converts an hour of broadcasting into 76.6 hours of watch time, against Twitch's 21.1. That is a 3.6× gap in audience per broadcast hour in Q1 2026 (16Best analysis), and it is the single most useful number on this page for someone deciding where to point a camera.

Before anyone reads that as YouTube's algorithm being kind, look at where it comes from. Twitch had 8.74 million unique channels broadcast in Q1 2026; YouTube Gaming had 1.07 million. Twitch's average is low because Twitch is where everybody starts. The two platforms are not running the same race — one has an eight-times larger field, most of it streaming to single digits.

16Best calculations from the Streamlabs and Stream Hatchet Q1 2026 figures, restricted to the three platforms so that supply and demand sit on the same base. The demand-to-supply index is share of watch hours divided by share of broadcast hours; 1.00 would mean a platform captures exactly the audience its supply of content implies. Live only, and TikTok Live, SOOP, CHZZK and others are excluded from this particular base by construction.

Does the top 1% take more on one platform than the other?

At the very top, the two platforms are almost identically concentrated — Twitch's ten biggest channels took 4.22% of its 2025 live hours, YouTube Gaming's took 4.64%. That result surprised us. The common claim is that YouTube spreads attention more evenly because search and recommendations do the distributing. On the live side, it does not.

Channel-level hours: Streams Charts annual rankings for 2025, which include all live activity by creators whose output is predominantly gaming. Platform totals: Stream Hatchet 2025 annual report. Numerator and denominator therefore come from two different trackers with different sampling, so the shares carry an error band we would put at roughly plus or minus a fifth of the stated value; the finding that survives it is that the two figures are close, not that 4.64 exceeds 4.22. Shares are 16Best calculations.

Some physical sense of that: Kai Cenat alone was watched for more hours in 2025 than YouTube Gaming's first and second most-watched channels combined (134.43 million against 118.40 million) (16Best analysis). One person, one platform, more live attention than the two biggest gaming channels on the largest video site on earth — when you count only live.

The honest reading is that concentration at the head is a property of live streaming itself, not of a platform's recommendation engine. Where the platforms genuinely differ is the middle: 8.74 million Twitch channels sharing 4.55 billion hours against 1.07 million YouTube Gaming channels sharing 2.22 billion. Median outcomes diverge; the top ten do not.

Which platform pays a streamer more?

Per subscription dollar, Kick then YouTube then Twitch — but the split is the least important of the three variables, and the one creators argue about most. What a creator earns is the split multiplied by the base multiplied by how many formats the base can be earned from. Twitch loses on the first and wins on none of the others.

Twitch's standard split has been 50/50 since 2016; the Partner Plus 70/30 tier requires a sustained base of paying subscribers (700 or more on the second tier introduced in 2024, excluding gifted and Prime subscriptions) and applies for 12 months. YouTube pays 70% of net revenue on channel memberships, Super Chat, Super Stickers and Super Thanks. Kick's 95/5 is described by the platform as a 5% payment-processing fee rather than a platform cut. Subscriber counts needed for $2,500 are 16Best calculations on the gross split only — they ignore payment-processing deductions and withholding tax, which creators report can reduce a Twitch Tier 1 net from about $4 in 2023 to under $3 in 2025 on large channels. YouTube's ad revenue share on long-form video is a separate 55/45 in the creator's favour.

We deliberately do not publish the same per-hour figure for YouTube Gaming. Alphabet does not break out gaming revenue, and no tracker publishes YouTube's gaming watch time on a VOD-inclusive basis, so any YouTube number would be a guess wearing a decimal point. What can be said with both sides sourced: YouTube has paid out more than $100 billion to creators, artists and media companies over four years, about $25 billion a year — roughly 14× Twitch's entire estimated annual revenue, and about 20× if you set YouTube's $36.15 billion of 2024 advertising revenue against Twitch's $1.8 billion of 2024 total revenue (16Best analysis; both are all-content, all-format figures for platforms whose gaming shares are unknown, so treat them as evidence of the size difference between the two companies rather than between the two gaming products).

Do exclusivity deals move the audience with the creator?

Partly, and less than the cheque implies — every documented case we could verify shows the creator arriving smaller than they left. This is the clearest evidence that the two platforms are different businesses: an audience built on appointment habit does not transfer cleanly onto a site organised around retrieval, and vice versa.

Ninja: Dot Esports and Dexerto reporting on Mixer-era averages, with the Microsoft deal reported at $20m to $30m. xQc: Stream Hatchet first-10-days analysis and Streams Charts first-month comparison. Ludwig: Streams Charts recap of his YouTube contract, December 2024. TimTheTatman and DrLupo: Dexerto and Streams Charts coverage of the September 2024 returns. Percentages are as published by those sources; we have not re-derived them.

Where does Kick actually fit in this?

Kick competes with Twitch's business and not with YouTube's — it is a live, subscription, creator-payout platform, and it has no VOD library to speak of. That is why its 95/5 split is a genuine threat to one company and an irrelevance to the other. Kick grew 131% to 4.5 billion hours in 2025, took roughly one-eighth of live-streaming hours, and then posted the first quarterly decline in its history in Q4 2025 before recovering to 1.27 billion hours in Q1 2026, up 65.35% year on year.

Its supply growth is the number to watch: unique Kick channels rose 54.49% year on year in Q1 2026 while Twitch's fell 5.50%. Creator acquisition is the strategy, and it is working on the input side. The platform was launched with backing associated with an online betting operator, which is a matter of ownership and content policy rather than of viewership, and is not otherwise relevant to the numbers here. On our trend work, Kick does not reach Twitch's level of live hours before roughly 2029 even on optimistic assumptions — and its growth rate had already turned down once by then.

Where is each platform's growth coming from?

YouTube's from Asia and the television set; Twitch's from nowhere in particular, which is the problem. Among the top 1,000 YouTube Gaming creators with country data in 2025, Japanese channels drew the most viewership at 451 million hours, ahead of the United States at 307 million, India at 194 million, Vietnam at 136 million and South Korea at 130 million.

Stream Hatchet 2025 YouTube Gaming Trends Report, restricted to the top 1,000 gaming creators for which country data is available — so these are not platform totals and do not sum to 8.8 billion. Stream Hatchet separately reports the audience distribution for top channels as 26% United States, 19% Japan and 11% Brazil; that is a viewer-location measure while the table is a creator-location measure, which is why the two orderings differ.

The mix is telling. YouTube Gaming's biggest single market by creator location is Japan, driven by VTuber channels — Miko Ch., Pekora Ch. and Kuzuha are three of its top five — and its fastest-growing titles are mobile-first: Mobile Legends: Bang Bang at 412 million hours, Free Fire at 380 million, Battlegrounds Mobile India at 209 million, and Roblox up 294% to 425 million. That is a growth engine running on phones in Asia and Latin America, which is exactly where mobile gaming is growing and exactly where Twitch is weakest. The esports side skews the same way: League of Legends and Mobile Legends: Bang Bang each passed 400 million hours on YouTube Gaming in 2025, and Worlds 2025 peaked at 3.8 million concurrent viewers there — numbers that belong to the most popular esports games and to the wider esports viewership picture rather than to a platform war.

The audience itself is narrower than the platform totals suggest. Stream Hatchet puts YouTube Gaming's viewers at 82% male, with 36% aged 25 to 29 and 26% aged 20 to 24 — older and more male-skewed than the gaming population as a whole. Live gaming video is not a mirror of who plays games; it is a slice of it, and both platforms are fishing in the same narrow part.

The other surface matters more than any of this. YouTube took 12.5% of all United States television viewing in January 2026 on Nielsen's Media Distributor Gauge, up from 10.8% a year earlier, and has led every media company for eleven consecutive months. Streaming as a whole passed 47.5% of US TV viewing in December 2025. Gaming video is riding a living-room distribution channel Twitch does not have, and no live-hours tracker registers a minute of it.

Why do Twitch and YouTube Gaming comparisons disagree?

Six reasons, and the first one accounts for most of the contradiction you will find online. This section is the disambiguator; if you cite one thing from this page, cite this.

1. Live versus VOD versus total watch time. Every tracker in this market measures live only. Twitch has no VOD business of consequence, so its live number is close to its whole number. YouTube's live number, on its own 2020 disclosure, was a tenth of its gaming watch time. Comparing 19.2 billion to 8.8 billion is a valid comparison of live-streaming businesses and an invalid comparison of gaming-video businesses, and almost every article that runs those two figures fails to say which one it is making.

2. What the total universe includes. Three reputable trackers published three different sizes for live streaming in 2025. Stream Hatchet's annual report put the whole market at 36.4 billion hours, up 6%. The Streamlabs quarterly series, which now folds in TikTok Live for every quarter, ran at 20.90 billion in Q4 2025 alone. Streams Charts, counting everything live outside mainland China, reported more than 30 billion hours in Q4 2025 by itself. None of them is wrong; they are counting different universes. Ratios computed inside one tracker's series are safe. Ratios computed across two are not, and where we have had to do it — the top-10 concentration table — we say so and widen the error band.

3. Concurrent viewers, hours watched and unique viewers are three different metrics. Hours watched rewards long sessions; average concurrents rewards consistency; unique viewers rewards reach. YouTube's strengths sit in the third, which no live tracker reports. A platform can lead on one and trail on another with no contradiction at all.

4. Trackers sample, and the sample can be gamed. Stream-tracking firms poll public channel data at intervals; they do not receive server-side truth from either company. When Twitch tightened its view-count handling in late July and August 2025, one analyst measured a 5% to 22% sitewide viewership drop depending on time of day, and reported that more than 41,000 channels averaging 50-plus viewers had shown at least one suspicious stream in Q2, with over 10% of those showing persistent signs of viewbotting. Twitch publicly disputed the framing, saying viewership was "by no means in decline." Part of Twitch's 2025 decline is therefore a measurement change, and nobody has quantified how much.

5. "YouTube Gaming" means at least three things. It has been a standalone app (launched 2015, shut down in 2019), a destination page on youtube.com, and — in every statistic on this page — a tracker's classification of live streams whose content is predominantly gaming, regardless of the category label the creator selected. Streams Charts states that rule explicitly. A figure built on category tags and a figure built on content classification will not match, which is one reason YouTube Gaming's 2025 total is quoted as 8.8 billion by one firm and produces different numbers when quarterly series from another are summed.

6. Multi-streaming is double-counted. A creator broadcasting simultaneously to Twitch and YouTube appears in both platforms' hours. The TimTheTatman example above — 31,700 concurrent on one and 20,900 on the other, from one broadcast — is a single visible instance of a market-wide effect no tracker adjusts for. It inflates the combined market and flatters whichever platform is the creator's secondary home.

And one thing nobody publishes. Amazon does not disclose Twitch's revenue; every figure you have read for it, including ours, traces to third-party estimation. Alphabet disclosed YouTube's total revenue for the first time in February 2026 and still does not break out gaming. The financial comparison at the centre of the "streaming war" story is, at present, unauditable on both sides.

Key takeaways

• The war framing is a category error. On live hours Twitch leads — 19.2 billion to 8.8 billion in 2025 — while losing share. On all gaming video YouTube has led for years. Both statements are true simultaneously, and the question "who is winning" is unanswerable until you name the business.
• The ratio that settles it is YouTube's own. More than 100 billion hours of gaming watch time in 2020, of which 10 billion live. 90% of YouTube's gaming audience was never on a stream, and no tracker in this category has ever counted them.
• Same year, opposite winners. In 2020, YouTube led on all-format gaming hours by roughly 5.4× and Twitch led on live hours by roughly 1.8× (16Best analysis). That is the entire argument in one row of a table.
• Twitch is bleeding, not collapsing. A compound −5.72% a year since the 2021 peak (16Best analysis), against a 22.9% relative share loss — because the rivals added 3.49 billion hours while Twitch shed 1.6 billion, and the pie grew 6.2%.
• Discoverability is real and mostly structural. 76.6 watch-hours per broadcast hour on YouTube Gaming against 21.1 on Twitch, and a demand-to-supply index of 2.48 against 0.68 (16Best analysis) — but Twitch runs a field of 8.74 million channels to YouTube Gaming's 1.07 million. Twitch is the industry's incubator and pays for it in its own averages.
• At the head, the platforms are twins. Top ten channels took 4.22% of Twitch's 2025 hours and 4.64% of YouTube Gaming's (16Best analysis). Concentration is a property of live streaming, not of an algorithm.
• Money is the one place the platforms are not comparable at all. Kick nets a creator $4.74 per $4.99 subscription, YouTube $3.49, Twitch $2.50 — and YouTube's annual creator payouts of about $25 billion are roughly 14× Twitch's entire estimated revenue. Twitch is fighting on the split; YouTube is not in that fight.
• So the spine, proved: Twitch and YouTube Gaming are not two competitors for one prize. Twitch is a live, appointment, subscription business whose whole product the trackers can see. YouTube Gaming is the live feature of an advertising-funded video library whose gaming consumption is roughly ten times larger than the part anyone measures. That is why the same quarter produces two leaders — and why a creator choosing between them is not choosing a platform, but a business model.

Frequently asked questions

Is YouTube Gaming bigger than Twitch in 2026?

It depends entirely on what is counted. On live gaming hours, Twitch is bigger: 19.2 billion hours in 2025 against YouTube Gaming's 8.8 billion, per Stream Hatchet, and 4.55 billion against 2.22 billion in Q1 2026 per Streamlabs. On total gaming video, YouTube is far bigger and has been for years — the company's own last published figure was more than 100 billion hours of gaming watch time in 2020, of which only 10 billion were live. Every tracker in this market measures live streams only, so the widely quoted comparison captures roughly a tenth of YouTube's gaming consumption and essentially all of Twitch's.

How many hours were watched on Twitch and YouTube Gaming in 2025?

Twitch recorded 19.2 billion hours watched in 2025, YouTube Gaming 8.8 billion and Kick 4.5 billion, according to Stream Hatchet's 2025 Yearly Live Streaming Trends Report, which put the whole live-streaming market at 36.4 billion hours, up 6%. All three figures are live hours only. Twitch's total is down from a 2021 peak of 24.3 billion, a compound decline of 5.72% a year on our calculation. YouTube Gaming's 8.8 billion was its highest annual total on that tracker's record, up 12% year on year.

Is it easier to grow on YouTube Gaming or Twitch?

The per-channel arithmetic favours YouTube Gaming heavily. In Q1 2026 a YouTube Gaming live channel delivered 76.6 watch-hours for every hour it broadcast, against 21.1 on Twitch and 81.4 on Kick, on our calculation from Streamlabs data. YouTube Gaming captured 27.6% of the three platforms' watch hours from 11.1% of their broadcast hours; Twitch captured 56.6% from 82.9%. But the gap is largely structural rather than algorithmic: 8.74 million unique channels streamed on Twitch that quarter against 1.07 million on YouTube Gaming. Twitch is where most streamers begin, and its averages carry that long tail. At the very top the platforms are almost identical, with the top ten channels taking 4.22% of Twitch's 2025 hours and 4.64% of YouTube Gaming's.

Does Twitch or YouTube pay streamers more?

Per subscription dollar, YouTube. On a $4.99 Tier 1 subscription a Twitch creator nets $2.50 on the standard 50/50 split, $3.49 under the Partner Plus 70/30 tier, $3.49 on a YouTube channel membership at 70/30, and $4.74 on Kick at 95/5. A Twitch streamer therefore needs about 1.9 times as many subscribers as a Kick streamer for the same subscription income. Beyond the split, YouTube pays 55% of long-form advertising revenue, and the company says it has paid creators, artists and media companies more than $100 billion over four years — roughly $25 billion a year against Twitch's estimated $1.8 billion of total 2024 revenue, about 58% of which came from subscriptions.

Why do different sites give different Twitch and YouTube Gaming numbers?

Six reasons. Live hours, VOD hours and total watch time are different quantities and only the first is tracked. Trackers cover different universes, which is why 2025 live streaming is reported as 36.4 billion hours by one firm while another counts more than 30 billion in Q4 alone. Concurrent viewers, hours watched and unique viewers each rank the platforms differently. Trackers sample public data rather than receiving it from the platforms, and Twitch's viewbotting crackdown in August 2025 cut measured sitewide viewership by 5% to 22% depending on time of day. "YouTube Gaming" has meant a discontinued app, a destination page and a tracker's content classification. And creators who broadcast to both platforms at once are counted twice.

Do streamers who leave Twitch keep their audience?

Not fully, in any documented case. Ninja averaged 12,036 viewers on Mixer after August 2019, a 33% drop, and the platform closed within a year. xQc averaged 48.1K on Kick in his first ten days against 62.4K on Twitch, a 23% fall, and 40.5K against 50.1K over the first full month. When TimTheTatman and DrLupo came off YouTube exclusivity in September 2024 and streamed to both platforms simultaneously, viewers split roughly 60:40 and 3:1 in Twitch's favour respectively. Ludwig's three-year YouTube contract drew 49.7 million hours across 659 broadcasts and more than doubled his subscriber count, and was not renewed. An audience built on appointment habit does not transfer cleanly to a platform organised around search and recommendation.

Sources

• Stream Hatchet (GameSquare) — 2025 Yearly Live Streaming Trends Report (36.4B hours total; Twitch 19.2B, YouTube Gaming 8.8B, Kick 4.5B)
• Stream Hatchet (GameSquare) — 2025 YouTube Gaming Trends Report (country and title breakdowns, sponsored streams, Shorts)
• Streamlabs and Stream Hatchet — Q4 2025 Live Streaming Report (hours watched, hours streamed and unique channels by platform)
• Stream Hatchet (GameSquare) — Q1 2026 Live Streaming Trends Report (Twitch 4.55B, YouTube Gaming 2.22B, Kick 1.27B)
• Streams Charts — Live streaming market 2025: YouTube above 47% of all livestreaming hours outside mainland China, TikTok close to 30%, Twitch just over 15%, Kick above 4%
• Streams Charts — Q4 2025 global livestreaming landscape (30B+ hours watched in the quarter, outside mainland China)
• Streams Charts — Top Twitch streamers of 2025 by hours watched (Kai Cenat 134.43M, Caedrel 108.43M)
• Streams Charts — Top YouTube Gaming streamers of 2025 by hours watched (IShowSpeed 69.08M, Miko Ch. 49.32M)
• Streams Charts — Ludwig does not renew his YouTube contract: 49.7M hours across 659 broadcasts, +3.6M subscribers
• Streams Charts — First month of xQc on Kick: 40.5K average viewers against 50.1K on Twitch
• Stream Hatchet — xQc average viewership 23% lower on Kick in his first 10 days (48.1K against 62.4K)
• Input / Inverse — Gaming content drove more than 100 billion hours of watch time on YouTube in 2020, including 10 billion hours of live gaming (YouTube figures, 8 December 2020)
• Tubefilter — YouTube Gaming hit 8.8 billion hours of watch time in 2025 (5 March 2026)
• Tubefilter — Alphabet reveals YouTube revenue for the first time: more than $60 billion in 2025
• Variety — YouTube full-year 2025 revenue topped $60 billion; advertising about $40.37 billion against $36.1 billion in 2024
• Google / YouTube — Neal Mohan annual letter, 2026: more than $100 billion paid to creators, artists and media companies over four years
• YouTube Help — YouTube partner earnings overview (55/45 on long-form advertising; 70/30 on memberships, Super Chat, Super Stickers and Super Thanks)
• TechCrunch — Twitch chief monetization officer on the Partner Plus 70/30 revenue split, TwitchCon 2023
• Business of Apps — Twitch revenue and usage statistics: estimated $1.8 billion of 2024 revenue, split roughly 58% subscriptions, 33% advertising, 9% Bits and other
• Forbes — Twitch viewbotting crackdown: 5% to 22% sitewide viewership drop; 41,000+ channels flagged in Q2 2025
• Dot Esports — Ninja viewership dropped 33% after moving to Mixer (12,036 average viewers)
• Dexerto — TimTheTatman and DrLupo viewers favour Twitch as YouTube exclusivity ends (31,700 against 20,900 on the same broadcast)
• Nielsen — Streaming reached 47.5% of US TV viewing in December 2025 (The Gauge)
• MediaPost — YouTube tops the Nielsen Media Distributor Gauge again with a 12.5% share in January 2026, up from 10.8% a year earlier
• Dot Esports — Over 27.9 billion hours watched across Twitch, YouTube Gaming and Facebook Gaming in 2020 (Streamlabs and Stream Hatchet)